Requex.me LogoRequex.me

Documentation

Browse by section

Keep all guides, tool docs, automation recipes, and comparison pages in one navigable place.

Docs Home
Docs

Foundation docs for getting started fast, understanding key terms, and tracking what has changed.

Guides

Start with fundamentals, then move into provider-specific webhook testing and production hardening.

Tool Docs

These pages explain what each tool does, when to use it, and how it fits into a webhook debugging workflow.

Automation Docs

Use these setup guides when you want forwarding rules, custom responses, security checks, or multi-destination fanout.

Compare

Use these pages to compare developer workflows, pricing tradeoffs, and feature differences between webhook tools.

Quick Answer

Make.com (formerly Integromat) charges by "operations" — every module run in every scenario counts. Requex.me runs webhook-triggered workflows free with no per-operation billing, code-level conditional routing, and persistent run logs.

Make.com Alternative — Free Webhook Workflows

Make.com's visual canvas is powerful for non-technical users but its operations-based pricing punishes high-volume webhook routing. Requex.me handles the same flows free with developer-grade tooling.

Last updated: May 2026 • 6 min read

How Make.com's Pricing Bites

Make.com bills by "operations." Each module execution — every webhook trigger, every router branch, every HTTP call — is an operation. A simple "receive webhook, branch on amount, POST to two endpoints" scenario uses 4 operations per trigger. At 10,000 triggers per month that's 40,000 ops — well past the 1,000 free operations and into mid-tier paid territory.

Requex doesn't meter steps. A workflow with 5 destinations costs the same as one with 1: zero.

Feature Comparison: Requex.me vs Make.com

FeatureRequex.meMake.com (Free)
Monthly operationsUnlimited1,000 ops
Active scenariosUnlimited2 active
Branching (Router)Built-in conditionsCounts as operation
HTTP fanoutSingle workflow, multi-destinationN modules = N ops
Webhook trigger latency< 1 secondPolling delay on free
Run logsPersistent + JSONLimited retention
AI nodes (Classify, Text)Included freeCounts as ops + BYO key
Webhook HMAC verifyFirst-class nodeCustom function
Visual canvasYes — workflow editorYes — strongest in market

The Requex workflow builder — 30+ nodes, AI included

Requex ships a visual canvas with HTTP Resilient, Try/Catch, Rate Limit, Iterator, jq Transform, AI Classify, AI Text, Webhook Verify, Dedup, Replay, Slack, Discord, Email, Google Sheets, and Shopify nodes. None of them count as billable operations — workflows run free during beta.

When Make Wins (And When It Doesn't)

Make.com still wins for non-developers automating tasks across SaaS apps where you need a deep library of pre-built modules (Google Drive uploads, Airtable updates, Salesforce records). Its visual canvas is exceptional for that audience.

It loses for developers running high-volume webhook routing, who don't need a SaaS module library because they can just call APIs themselves. That's where Requex's flat-rate model wins by a wide margin.

Migrating From Make.com (3 Steps)

  1. Repoint the trigger — replace the Make webhook URL in your source service (Stripe / GitHub / etc.) with a Requex webhook URL.
  2. Re-create routing — Requex workflows use JSON-path conditions instead of Make's Router. body.event == "payment.succeeded" replaces a router filter.
  3. Configure destinations — add the HTTP endpoints your old scenario was calling. Save and watch the next real event flow through.

Related Resources

Free Make.com Alternative

Unlimited operations. AI nodes. Conditional workflows. Multi-destination routing.

See the workflow builder →